README.md
KESPA-EXP-001 — Autonomous Knowledge Gap Acquisition
Date: 2026-09-15 Status: Verified Project: KESPA AI / NexLabs Studios
Research question
Can KESPA identify a missing stable concept during normal use, gather independent public evidence, verify candidate claims, and promote the result into trusted retrieval knowledge without retraining the base model?
Live test
The user asked:
What is a Cuckoo filter?
At the time of the request KESPA recorded:
- Trust score: 0.480
- RAG cards: 0
- Top RAG score: 0.000
The natural research gap detector classified the interaction as a genuine public-general-knowledge gap and created a research request.
Result
The isolated research lifecycle completed successfully:
- 3 independent source organizations
- 3 fetched evidence records
- 4 candidate claims
- 4 verified claims
- Trusted release:
forge-release-07990ffc7fc9d09f9be2dd3b - Candidate:
#82 - Verification:
PASS - Trusted Knowledge:
#74 - Indexed for retrieval: yes
- NexLedger asset:
FORGEAI#TK123V1
What this demonstrates
This run demonstrates that KESPA can, for at least one stable public-knowledge case:
1. detect weak or absent retrieval coverage during normal use;
2. create a research request automatically;
3. discover and fetch public evidence;
4. require multiple independent organizations;
5. generate candidate factual claims;
6. verify those claims against supplied evidence;
7. produce a trusted release;
8. promote the release to production trusted knowledge;
9. index that knowledge for future retrieval; and
10. establish public provenance through NexLedger.
The base local model weights were not changed.
What this does not prove
This experiment does not establish broad autonomous-learning reliability, general superiority over larger models, or a quantified improvement in answer quality. A separate controlled before/after retrieval study is still required.
Public provenance
NexLedger:
https://nexledger.nexlabs.studio/explorer/asset?asset=FORGEAI%23TK123V1